<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (7) TMI 1009 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=262048</link>
    <description>The appeal was rejected as time-barred by the first appellate authority. The appellant failed to appear for the hearing or request an adjournment. The appeal was filed against an Order-in-Original (OIO) dated 13.02.2012, with the appellant claiming non-receipt and requesting a copy in 2013. The Revenue argued that the OIO was sent by Registered Post Acknowledgement Due (RPAD) to the known address, supported by case law. The court upheld the rejection, citing legal precedents, and dismissed the appellant&#039;s appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2015 18:53:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=391744" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (7) TMI 1009 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=262048</link>
      <description>The appeal was rejected as time-barred by the first appellate authority. The appellant failed to appear for the hearing or request an adjournment. The appeal was filed against an Order-in-Original (OIO) dated 13.02.2012, with the appellant claiming non-receipt and requesting a copy in 2013. The Revenue argued that the OIO was sent by Registered Post Acknowledgement Due (RPAD) to the known address, supported by case law. The court upheld the rejection, citing legal precedents, and dismissed the appellant&#039;s appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=262048</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>