https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=262029 The appeal of the revenue was dismissed by the Tribunal. The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) decisions to delete various additions to the assessee's income were upheld. The Tribunal found that the Assessing Officer did not follow proper procedures, lacked concrete evidence, and made assumptions without basis. The Tribunal agreed with the Commissioner's reasoning for deleting the additions related to HUF income, labor charges, clubbing of daughters-in-law's income, and rejection of book results for estimation of GP. The general grounds raised by the revenue were rejected, and the decision was pronounced on 24-07-2015. en-us Fri, 24 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 30 Jul 2015 16:46:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=262029 The appeal of the revenue was dismissed by the Tribunal. The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) decisions to delete various additions to the assessee's income were upheld. The Tribunal found that the Assessing Officer did not follow proper procedures, lacked concrete evidence, and made assumptions without basis. The Tribunal agreed with the Commissioner's reasoning for deleting the additions related to HUF income, labor charges, clubbing of daughters-in-law's income, and rejection of book results for estimation of GP. The general grounds raised by the revenue were rejected, and the decision was pronounced on 24-07-2015. Case-Laws Income Tax Fri, 24 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=262029