<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (4) TMI 673 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171717</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court upheld the Labour Court&#039;s decision regarding disciplinary actions against workmen involved in an illegal strike. It found the punishment of stoppage of increments with cumulative effect to be just and proper, criticizing the High Court&#039;s interference. The Court emphasized the seriousness of the charges and rejected the application of the doctrine of proportionality. Despite upholding the original award, the Supreme Court, considering industrial peace and the passage of time, chose not to disturb limited benefits granted by the Division Bench to the workmen, disposing of the appeal without costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2015 10:21:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=391701" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (4) TMI 673 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171717</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court upheld the Labour Court&#039;s decision regarding disciplinary actions against workmen involved in an illegal strike. It found the punishment of stoppage of increments with cumulative effect to be just and proper, criticizing the High Court&#039;s interference. The Court emphasized the seriousness of the charges and rejected the application of the doctrine of proportionality. Despite upholding the original award, the Supreme Court, considering industrial peace and the passage of time, chose not to disturb limited benefits granted by the Division Bench to the workmen, disposing of the appeal without costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171717</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>