https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171708 A conciliation proceeding under the Industrial Disputes Act continues until the failure report reaches the appropriate Government, so a discharge made before that stage without written permission violates Section 33(1) and is illegal. Prior notice under Section 9-A is required before introducing rationalisation or a new technique likely to lead to retrenchment; a notice served after the change has already been implemented is belated and ineffective. The text also explains that such discharge may amount to unfair labour practice only under item 1(f) of Schedule IV where it is shown to have been passed with undue haste, even if it is not victimisation or a colourable exercise of power. Interference with the authorities is justified where they commit errors of law. en-us Mon, 19 Jul 1999 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 29 Jul 2015 16:59:18 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171708 A conciliation proceeding under the Industrial Disputes Act continues until the failure report reaches the appropriate Government, so a discharge made before that stage without written permission violates Section 33(1) and is illegal. Prior notice under Section 9-A is required before introducing rationalisation or a new technique likely to lead to retrenchment; a notice served after the change has already been implemented is belated and ineffective. The text also explains that such discharge may amount to unfair labour practice only under item 1(f) of Schedule IV where it is shown to have been passed with undue haste, even if it is not victimisation or a colourable exercise of power. Interference with the authorities is justified where they commit errors of law. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 19 Jul 1999 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171708