https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171703 For eviction under Section 10(3)(c) of the Tamil Nadu Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, a portion of premises will not be treated as a separate and distinct unit unless the context and actual user support that characterisation; a small non-residential portion within a residential building may therefore be included for the landlord's requirement. The phrase "as the case may be" is read according to the factual situation and adds no independent restriction where no separate unit exists. Comparative hardship is assessed by the parties' relative ability to secure alternative accommodation, and eviction is not barred where the tenant can relocate but the landlord would suffer greater hardship. en-us Fri, 28 Aug 1987 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 29 Jul 2015 16:24:03 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171703 For eviction under Section 10(3)(c) of the Tamil Nadu Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, a portion of premises will not be treated as a separate and distinct unit unless the context and actual user support that characterisation; a small non-residential portion within a residential building may therefore be included for the landlord's requirement. The phrase "as the case may be" is read according to the factual situation and adds no independent restriction where no separate unit exists. Comparative hardship is assessed by the parties' relative ability to secure alternative accommodation, and eviction is not barred where the tenant can relocate but the landlord would suffer greater hardship. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 28 Aug 1987 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171703