<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1995 (8) TMI 309 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171694</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court upheld the High Court&#039;s decision in a case involving grant-in-aid to non-Government Law Colleges, directing the State of Maharashtra to extend the scheme to all recognized private law colleges from the academic year 1995. The Court found the State&#039;s actions discriminatory and emphasized its obligation under Articles 21 and 39A of the Constitution to provide free legal aid and ensure high standards in legal education. Final directions included implementing the grant-in-aid and pension-cum-gratuity schemes and maintaining standards in legal education. The appeals were disposed of with no order as to costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 16 Aug 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2015 14:30:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=391663" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1995 (8) TMI 309 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171694</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court upheld the High Court&#039;s decision in a case involving grant-in-aid to non-Government Law Colleges, directing the State of Maharashtra to extend the scheme to all recognized private law colleges from the academic year 1995. The Court found the State&#039;s actions discriminatory and emphasized its obligation under Articles 21 and 39A of the Constitution to provide free legal aid and ensure high standards in legal education. Final directions included implementing the grant-in-aid and pension-cum-gratuity schemes and maintaining standards in legal education. The appeals were disposed of with no order as to costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Aug 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171694</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>