https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=262008 The case involved the admissibility of CENVAT Credit on outdoor catering services provided to the Appellant. The Appellant, engaged in technical services, argued that they bore the expenses and were entitled to the credit. The documents supporting this claim were not initially presented. The court set aside the previous decision and remanded the case for further review, instructing the Appellant to provide all necessary documentation. The appeals were allowed for reconsideration by the Adjudicating authority. en-us Tue, 21 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 29 Jul 2015 07:48:47 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=262008 The case involved the admissibility of CENVAT Credit on outdoor catering services provided to the Appellant. The Appellant, engaged in technical services, argued that they bore the expenses and were entitled to the credit. The documents supporting this claim were not initially presented. The court set aside the previous decision and remanded the case for further review, instructing the Appellant to provide all necessary documentation. The appeals were allowed for reconsideration by the Adjudicating authority. Case-Laws Service Tax Tue, 21 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=262008