<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (7) TMI 963 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=262002</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court ruled that the appeal is not maintainable under Section 35-L (B) of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The Department can appeal to the High Court under Section 35-G, where the High Court will determine if there is a substantial question of law. The appellant has been given a two-month extension to file an appeal in the High Court without facing dismissal due to limitations.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2015 15:25:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=391618" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (7) TMI 963 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=262002</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court ruled that the appeal is not maintainable under Section 35-L (B) of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The Department can appeal to the High Court under Section 35-G, where the High Court will determine if there is a substantial question of law. The appellant has been given a two-month extension to file an appeal in the High Court without facing dismissal due to limitations.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=262002</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>