<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (7) TMI 960 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261999</link>
    <description>An appellate order was set aside because the tribunal proceeded on an incorrect factual premise about the effect of an earlier appellate decision. The Supreme Court noted that the prior CEGAT order in Web Impressions (India) Pvt. Ltd. had not been upheld; instead, it had been set aside and remanded for fresh adjudication. As the tribunal&#039;s reliance on that mistaken assumption was unsound, the matter was remitted to the CESTAT for fresh consideration and hearing of both parties, with all contentions expressly left open.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Aug 2017 18:26:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=391615" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (7) TMI 960 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261999</link>
      <description>An appellate order was set aside because the tribunal proceeded on an incorrect factual premise about the effect of an earlier appellate decision. The Supreme Court noted that the prior CEGAT order in Web Impressions (India) Pvt. Ltd. had not been upheld; instead, it had been set aside and remanded for fresh adjudication. As the tribunal&#039;s reliance on that mistaken assumption was unsound, the matter was remitted to the CESTAT for fresh consideration and hearing of both parties, with all contentions expressly left open.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261999</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>