<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (7) TMI 951 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261990</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the Tax Appeal, upholding the ITAT&#039;s decision to reduce the disallowance of unexplained purchases from 20% to 10% based on the higher GP rate disclosed by the assessee. However, the court criticized the ITAT for lacking detailed reasoning in its order and emphasized the importance of providing reasoned and speaking orders, directing the ITAT to comply with this requirement in the future.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2015 12:34:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=391606" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (7) TMI 951 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261990</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the Tax Appeal, upholding the ITAT&#039;s decision to reduce the disallowance of unexplained purchases from 20% to 10% based on the higher GP rate disclosed by the assessee. However, the court criticized the ITAT for lacking detailed reasoning in its order and emphasized the importance of providing reasoned and speaking orders, directing the ITAT to comply with this requirement in the future.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261990</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>