<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (7) TMI 946 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261985</link>
    <description>Interest earned by a co-operative society on fixed deposits made from surplus funds temporarily not required for lending to members was held deductible under section 80P(2)(a)(i). The society&#039;s principal object was to provide credit facilities, and the interest had a proximate connection with that business. The expression &quot;attributable to&quot; was treated as wider than &quot;derived from&quot;, so income from temporary deployment of surplus funds fell within the deduction. The case was distinguished from situations where the invested amount represents a liability payable to members, and the Revenue&#039;s challenge failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2015 07:47:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=391601" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (7) TMI 946 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261985</link>
      <description>Interest earned by a co-operative society on fixed deposits made from surplus funds temporarily not required for lending to members was held deductible under section 80P(2)(a)(i). The society&#039;s principal object was to provide credit facilities, and the interest had a proximate connection with that business. The expression &quot;attributable to&quot; was treated as wider than &quot;derived from&quot;, so income from temporary deployment of surplus funds fell within the deduction. The case was distinguished from situations where the invested amount represents a liability payable to members, and the Revenue&#039;s challenge failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261985</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>