<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (7) TMI 938 - ITAT LUCKNOW</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261977</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT&#039;s decision that the assessment order dated 30.12.2010 was erroneous and prejudicial to the interest of revenue. The Tribunal found various deficiencies in the assessment order, including the improper handling of service tax deductions and lack of proper enquiry by the Assessing Officer. The direction for a fresh assessment was deemed enforceable, and the CIT&#039;s order dated 28.03.2013 was upheld as valid and sustainable. The appellant&#039;s arguments regarding the validity of payments made and the CIT&#039;s jurisdiction were dismissed, leading to the dismissal of the appeal and affirmation of the CIT&#039;s order under Section 263 of the Income Tax Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2015 07:46:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=391593" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (7) TMI 938 - ITAT LUCKNOW</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261977</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT&#039;s decision that the assessment order dated 30.12.2010 was erroneous and prejudicial to the interest of revenue. The Tribunal found various deficiencies in the assessment order, including the improper handling of service tax deductions and lack of proper enquiry by the Assessing Officer. The direction for a fresh assessment was deemed enforceable, and the CIT&#039;s order dated 28.03.2013 was upheld as valid and sustainable. The appellant&#039;s arguments regarding the validity of payments made and the CIT&#039;s jurisdiction were dismissed, leading to the dismissal of the appeal and affirmation of the CIT&#039;s order under Section 263 of the Income Tax Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261977</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>