<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (11) TMI 1551 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171662</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled that Section 194J was not applicable to payments made to blood banks as these were made by the patients, not the hospital. Payments to retainer doctors were deemed to be salary, subject to TDS under Section 192. The markup on the sale of medicines by FHWL was not considered commission, and thus, Section 194H was not applicable. The Tribunal should not invoke Section 194C as it was not raised by either party and was not relevant to the markup on the sale of medicines.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 Nov 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2015 07:45:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=391584" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (11) TMI 1551 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171662</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled that Section 194J was not applicable to payments made to blood banks as these were made by the patients, not the hospital. Payments to retainer doctors were deemed to be salary, subject to TDS under Section 192. The markup on the sale of medicines by FHWL was not considered commission, and thus, Section 194H was not applicable. The Tribunal should not invoke Section 194C as it was not raised by either party and was not relevant to the markup on the sale of medicines.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Nov 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171662</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>