<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (2) TMI 681 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171672</link>
    <description>Imported goods covered by List 13 for petroleum operations are eligible for exemption under Notification No. 12/2012-Cus. when the prescribed essentiality certificate from the Directorate General of Hydrocarbons is produced. The certificate in this matter was undisputed and confirmed that the items were required for petroleum operations under the relevant contract. Because the goods were shown as components and equipment for production operations, they fell within the notified entry, and exemption could not be denied on the basis that some items were said not to form part of petroleum operations. The denial of the exemption was therefore unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2015 07:45:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=391573" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (2) TMI 681 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171672</link>
      <description>Imported goods covered by List 13 for petroleum operations are eligible for exemption under Notification No. 12/2012-Cus. when the prescribed essentiality certificate from the Directorate General of Hydrocarbons is produced. The certificate in this matter was undisputed and confirmed that the items were required for petroleum operations under the relevant contract. Because the goods were shown as components and equipment for production operations, they fell within the notified entry, and exemption could not be denied on the basis that some items were said not to form part of petroleum operations. The denial of the exemption was therefore unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171672</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>