<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (11) TMI 938 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171659</link>
    <description>The High Court of Allahabad dismissed the writ petition regarding the seizure and detention of vehicles, stating that writ jurisdiction was not appropriate for determining liability or damages. The petitioner was advised to file a separate suit for damages, with the assurance that the suit would be decided independently of the judgment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 01 Nov 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2015 16:21:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=391561" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (11) TMI 938 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171659</link>
      <description>The High Court of Allahabad dismissed the writ petition regarding the seizure and detention of vehicles, stating that writ jurisdiction was not appropriate for determining liability or damages. The petitioner was advised to file a separate suit for damages, with the assurance that the suit would be decided independently of the judgment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Nov 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171659</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>