https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171631 The Tribunal upheld the confiscation of goods seized at the Air Cargo Complex under Sections 113(d) and 113(i) of the Customs Act, along with fines and penalties imposed under Sections 114 and 114AA. However, confiscation, fines, and penalties for goods seized at other premises were set aside as unsustainable. The appellant's claim of a violation of natural justice principles due to denied cross-examination was dismissed as the evidence, including export documents and statements, was deemed sufficient to establish the charges. The appeals were disposed of accordingly. en-us Fri, 08 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 28 Jul 2015 10:10:31 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171631 The Tribunal upheld the confiscation of goods seized at the Air Cargo Complex under Sections 113(d) and 113(i) of the Customs Act, along with fines and penalties imposed under Sections 114 and 114AA. However, confiscation, fines, and penalties for goods seized at other premises were set aside as unsustainable. The appellant's claim of a violation of natural justice principles due to denied cross-examination was dismissed as the evidence, including export documents and statements, was deemed sufficient to establish the charges. The appeals were disposed of accordingly. Case-Laws Customs Fri, 08 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171631