https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261968 The appellant appealed against an Order-In-Appeal confirming the Cenvat credit of Rs. 65,862.48 and imposing a penalty of Rs. 1,48,851 for wrong availment. The appellant admitted to availing Cenvat credit on CBFS while using diesel oil, breaching Cenvat Credit Rules. The Commissioner upheld the penalty and extended the limitation period due to fraudulent intent and suppression. The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the Commissioner's findings, denying the refund claim due to lack of evidence. en-us Thu, 11 Dec 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 28 Jul 2015 13:48:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261968 The appellant appealed against an Order-In-Appeal confirming the Cenvat credit of Rs. 65,862.48 and imposing a penalty of Rs. 1,48,851 for wrong availment. The appellant admitted to availing Cenvat credit on CBFS while using diesel oil, breaching Cenvat Credit Rules. The Commissioner upheld the penalty and extended the limitation period due to fraudulent intent and suppression. The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the Commissioner's findings, denying the refund claim due to lack of evidence. Case-Laws Service Tax Thu, 11 Dec 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261968