<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (7) TMI 924 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261963</link>
    <description>Unretracted statements recorded under the Customs Act may be relied on in customs house agent disciplinary proceedings where they establish licence sub-letting, unauthorised operations, inadequate client advice, deficient records and lack of employee supervision. Serious misuse of a customs house agent licence, including its effective use by an outsider for consideration, can justify revocation and forfeiture of the security deposit. Revocation may be selected instead of suspension where the misconduct is grave, unless the penalty is illegal, irrational, procedurally improper or shockingly disproportionate. Binding jurisdictional precedent governs disciplinary control over such licences.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2015 13:22:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=391497" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (7) TMI 924 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261963</link>
      <description>Unretracted statements recorded under the Customs Act may be relied on in customs house agent disciplinary proceedings where they establish licence sub-letting, unauthorised operations, inadequate client advice, deficient records and lack of employee supervision. Serious misuse of a customs house agent licence, including its effective use by an outsider for consideration, can justify revocation and forfeiture of the security deposit. Revocation may be selected instead of suspension where the misconduct is grave, unless the penalty is illegal, irrational, procedurally improper or shockingly disproportionate. Binding jurisdictional precedent governs disciplinary control over such licences.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261963</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>