<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (7) TMI 915 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261954</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the assessee&#039;s use of Berry Ratio and rejected the TPO&#039;s re-characterization of service/commission transactions as trading transactions. It found the TPO&#039;s adjustments for location savings and intangibles unwarranted. The inclusion of FOB value in the cost base was deemed impermissible, leading to a remand for fresh examination. The appeal was partly allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2015 06:55:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=391488" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (7) TMI 915 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261954</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the assessee&#039;s use of Berry Ratio and rejected the TPO&#039;s re-characterization of service/commission transactions as trading transactions. It found the TPO&#039;s adjustments for location savings and intangibles unwarranted. The inclusion of FOB value in the cost base was deemed impermissible, leading to a remand for fresh examination. The appeal was partly allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261954</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>