<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (7) TMI 906 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261945</link>
    <description>The ITAT ruled in favor of the appellant, allowing the provision for bad advances as revenue expenditure and approving the excess remuneration paid to directors. However, the issue of depreciation on expenditure treated as revenue was remitted back to the AO for fresh adjudication.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2015 06:54:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=391479" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (7) TMI 906 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261945</link>
      <description>The ITAT ruled in favor of the appellant, allowing the provision for bad advances as revenue expenditure and approving the excess remuneration paid to directors. However, the issue of depreciation on expenditure treated as revenue was remitted back to the AO for fresh adjudication.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261945</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>