https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261939 The ITAT Delhi upheld the CIT(A) order, restricting the addition to the appellant's income from running vehicles on hire under section 44AE. The appellant's failure to disclose income from vehicle operations led to the addition of cash deposits in the bank account under section 69A. The ITAT affirmed the CIT(A)'s decision, dismissing the Revenue's appeal and emphasizing compliance with legal requirements. The judgment provides a comprehensive analysis of the case, supporting the CIT(A)'s reasoned approach in restricting the addition based on the appellant's non-disclosure and statutory provisions. en-us Fri, 09 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 28 Jul 2015 06:54:13 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261939 The ITAT Delhi upheld the CIT(A) order, restricting the addition to the appellant's income from running vehicles on hire under section 44AE. The appellant's failure to disclose income from vehicle operations led to the addition of cash deposits in the bank account under section 69A. The ITAT affirmed the CIT(A)'s decision, dismissing the Revenue's appeal and emphasizing compliance with legal requirements. The judgment provides a comprehensive analysis of the case, supporting the CIT(A)'s reasoned approach in restricting the addition based on the appellant's non-disclosure and statutory provisions. Case-Laws Income Tax Fri, 09 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261939