https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261938 The Tribunal rejected the Revenue's adjournment request for the appointment of a Special Counsel due to prolonged delays and the assessee's compliance with tax liabilities. It found the D.R.P.'s failure to consider objections and provide reasoning for decisions on arm's length pricing and various services. Consequently, the Tribunal restored all issues to the D.R.P. for re-adjudication, emphasizing the importance of reasoned decisions and fair consideration of objections. This procedural victory allows the assessee another opportunity for their objections to be properly addressed. en-us Mon, 02 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 28 Jul 2015 06:54:11 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261938 The Tribunal rejected the Revenue's adjournment request for the appointment of a Special Counsel due to prolonged delays and the assessee's compliance with tax liabilities. It found the D.R.P.'s failure to consider objections and provide reasoning for decisions on arm's length pricing and various services. Consequently, the Tribunal restored all issues to the D.R.P. for re-adjudication, emphasizing the importance of reasoned decisions and fair consideration of objections. This procedural victory allows the assessee another opportunity for their objections to be properly addressed. Case-Laws Income Tax Mon, 02 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261938