<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (7) TMI 894 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261933</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court allowed the Appeals, emphasizing the importance of proper service of legal documents and adherence to statutory provisions to prevent miscarriages of justice. The Court directed a reevaluation of the Appeal on its merits by the Commissioner (Appeals), considering the date of knowledge by the Appellant as the starting point for the limitation period.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Aug 2017 18:29:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=391459" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (7) TMI 894 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261933</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court allowed the Appeals, emphasizing the importance of proper service of legal documents and adherence to statutory provisions to prevent miscarriages of justice. The Court directed a reevaluation of the Appeal on its merits by the Commissioner (Appeals), considering the date of knowledge by the Appellant as the starting point for the limitation period.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261933</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>