https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171621 Where the State directly runs the transport undertaking, the opinion required to initiate a nationalisation scheme under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 is legally attributable to that undertaking, so the scheme is not invalid on the ground that the State Government acted through its officers. A new objection to the authorisation of the officer hearing and approving the scheme under Section 68D cannot ordinarily be raised for the first time before the Supreme Court, especially after the scheme has been published and has become final. Once the scheme is final, curtailment, renewal, cancellation and other permit-related orders are merely consequential and not independently assailable, and challenges to State buses operating on the nationalised route without permits are not maintainable absent an enforceable legal right. en-us Mon, 11 Dec 1961 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 31 Jul 2015 12:50:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171621 Where the State directly runs the transport undertaking, the opinion required to initiate a nationalisation scheme under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 is legally attributable to that undertaking, so the scheme is not invalid on the ground that the State Government acted through its officers. A new objection to the authorisation of the officer hearing and approving the scheme under Section 68D cannot ordinarily be raised for the first time before the Supreme Court, especially after the scheme has been published and has become final. Once the scheme is final, curtailment, renewal, cancellation and other permit-related orders are merely consequential and not independently assailable, and challenges to State buses operating on the nationalised route without permits are not maintainable absent an enforceable legal right. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 11 Dec 1961 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171621