https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171620 Service rules governing direct recruitment prescribed an upper age limit of 28 years and limited relaxation categories; earlier NMR engagement did not confer any enforceable right to appointment or age relaxation, and prior ad hoc concessions to others could not be relied on to claim equality as of right. A writ of mandamus could not be issued to compel consideration or grant of exemption from the age bar because no enabling rule created a statutory duty or corresponding legal right. The High Court's relief was therefore unsustainable, and termination of the respondents for ineligibility under the service rules was upheld. en-us Thu, 03 May 2007 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 06 Apr 2017 15:41:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171620 Service rules governing direct recruitment prescribed an upper age limit of 28 years and limited relaxation categories; earlier NMR engagement did not confer any enforceable right to appointment or age relaxation, and prior ad hoc concessions to others could not be relied on to claim equality as of right. A writ of mandamus could not be issued to compel consideration or grant of exemption from the age bar because no enabling rule created a statutory duty or corresponding legal right. The High Court's relief was therefore unsustainable, and termination of the respondents for ineligibility under the service rules was upheld. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 03 May 2007 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171620