https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171619 A statutory liquor-licensing regime requiring prior State approval treated grant of the licence as a privilege and not an enforceable right. A court could not issue mandamus to compel immediate grant in disregard of Rule 7 or a condition precedent; if interference was warranted, the matter had to be remitted for reconsideration under the Rules. In considering a competing applicant, fairness required notice and hearing, but not disclosure of confidential adverse material such as internal reports or secret sources. The applicant's challenge failed where the rejection was supported by inquiry material and no mala fides, denial of fair hearing, or apparent error was shown. en-us Thu, 15 Mar 1984 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 27 Jul 2015 16:35:15 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171619 A statutory liquor-licensing regime requiring prior State approval treated grant of the licence as a privilege and not an enforceable right. A court could not issue mandamus to compel immediate grant in disregard of Rule 7 or a condition precedent; if interference was warranted, the matter had to be remitted for reconsideration under the Rules. In considering a competing applicant, fairness required notice and hearing, but not disclosure of confidential adverse material such as internal reports or secret sources. The applicant's challenge failed where the rejection was supported by inquiry material and no mala fides, denial of fair hearing, or apparent error was shown. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 15 Mar 1984 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171619