https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171617 The Tribunal set aside the revocation of the Customs House Agent (CHA) license and forfeiture of the security deposit due to alleged violations of CHALR, 2004 regulations. The appellant's appeal was successful as the Tribunal found inconsistencies in the Commissioner's decisions and emphasized the importance of consistency in judgments. The Tribunal concluded that the revocation was not legally sustainable, directing the Commissioner to reinstate the appellant's CHA license immediately. en-us Tue, 27 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 17 Mar 2017 10:39:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171617 The Tribunal set aside the revocation of the Customs House Agent (CHA) license and forfeiture of the security deposit due to alleged violations of CHALR, 2004 regulations. The appellant's appeal was successful as the Tribunal found inconsistencies in the Commissioner's decisions and emphasized the importance of consistency in judgments. The Tribunal concluded that the revocation was not legally sustainable, directing the Commissioner to reinstate the appellant's CHA license immediately. Case-Laws Customs Tue, 27 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171617