https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171616 The Tribunal found that the licence suspension, imposed on the allegation of abetting a conspiracy, was unsupported by evidence, and the High Court accepted that factual conclusion. As the challenge depended on evaluation of the record and disclosed no legal principle requiring review, the Court held that no question of law arose. In the absence of any legal issue warranting appellate interference, the Tribunal's finding was upheld and the suspension could not stand on the alleged ground of abetment. en-us Wed, 16 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 04 Sep 2017 11:58:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171616 The Tribunal found that the licence suspension, imposed on the allegation of abetting a conspiracy, was unsupported by evidence, and the High Court accepted that factual conclusion. As the challenge depended on evaluation of the record and disclosed no legal principle requiring review, the Court held that no question of law arose. In the absence of any legal issue warranting appellate interference, the Tribunal's finding was upheld and the suspension could not stand on the alleged ground of abetment. Case-Laws Customs Wed, 16 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171616