https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171600 Acquisition of land for house sites to members of a cooperative housing society was treated as falling within the expanded concept of public purpose, and earlier acquisitions of other lands did not by themselves establish mala fides; the challenge on that ground failed. Pre-Gazette newspaper publication of the Section 4(1) notification was held to be only a procedural irregularity, not a fatal defect, because Gazette publication was ultimately made and notice to owners was achieved. The period spent in bona fide writ proceedings was excluded for computing the Section 6(1) limitation, so the acquisition had not lapsed and the proceedings remained valid. en-us Wed, 28 Aug 1996 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 27 Jul 2015 11:32:37 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171600 Acquisition of land for house sites to members of a cooperative housing society was treated as falling within the expanded concept of public purpose, and earlier acquisitions of other lands did not by themselves establish mala fides; the challenge on that ground failed. Pre-Gazette newspaper publication of the Section 4(1) notification was held to be only a procedural irregularity, not a fatal defect, because Gazette publication was ultimately made and notice to owners was achieved. The period spent in bona fide writ proceedings was excluded for computing the Section 6(1) limitation, so the acquisition had not lapsed and the proceedings remained valid. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 28 Aug 1996 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171600