<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (7) TMI 886 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261925</link>
    <description>Services performed for a Transport Department in discharge of statutory functions under the Motor Vehicles Act were not business auxiliary service under section 65(19) of the Finance Act, 1994. Establishing service centres in public offices and carrying out statutory duties did not amount to customer care, promotion or marketing of services, or any incidental auxiliary support activity. Services rendered to public authorities in the course of statutory functions fall outside the taxable category unless they satisfy the statutory definition of taxable support or promotion. The assessee&#039;s position was therefore upheld and the revenue&#039;s appeal failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 22 Aug 2015 12:51:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=391381" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (7) TMI 886 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261925</link>
      <description>Services performed for a Transport Department in discharge of statutory functions under the Motor Vehicles Act were not business auxiliary service under section 65(19) of the Finance Act, 1994. Establishing service centres in public offices and carrying out statutory duties did not amount to customer care, promotion or marketing of services, or any incidental auxiliary support activity. Services rendered to public authorities in the course of statutory functions fall outside the taxable category unless they satisfy the statutory definition of taxable support or promotion. The assessee&#039;s position was therefore upheld and the revenue&#039;s appeal failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261925</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>