https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261924 The Tribunal confirmed Service Tax demand for outdoor catering services provided by the appellant at a company's premises. The appellant's argument of not falling under the caterer definition was rejected, and they were held liable for Service Tax. However, the penalty under Section 78 of the Finance Act was set aside due to the appellant's genuine belief and prompt payment of the tax. The appeal was disposed of with this outcome. en-us Thu, 18 Dec 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 27 Jul 2015 08:04:38 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261924 The Tribunal confirmed Service Tax demand for outdoor catering services provided by the appellant at a company's premises. The appellant's argument of not falling under the caterer definition was rejected, and they were held liable for Service Tax. However, the penalty under Section 78 of the Finance Act was set aside due to the appellant's genuine belief and prompt payment of the tax. The appeal was disposed of with this outcome. Case-Laws Service Tax Thu, 18 Dec 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261924