<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (7) TMI 862 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261901</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete additions made by the AO under section 68, as the assessee proved the genuineness of transactions and complied with the burden of proof. The appeals against orders for AYs 2006-07 &amp;amp; 2007-08 were dismissed, affirming the CIT(A)&#039;s orders.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2015 08:02:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=391357" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (7) TMI 862 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261901</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete additions made by the AO under section 68, as the assessee proved the genuineness of transactions and complied with the burden of proof. The appeals against orders for AYs 2006-07 &amp;amp; 2007-08 were dismissed, affirming the CIT(A)&#039;s orders.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261901</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>