<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (7) TMI 844 - ITAT LUCKNOW</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261883</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the decisions of the CIT(A) on various issues, except for the unsecured loan from U.P. Cooperative Sugar Factories Federation Limited, which was remanded for further review. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was partially allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2015 10:22:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=391303" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (7) TMI 844 - ITAT LUCKNOW</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261883</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the decisions of the CIT(A) on various issues, except for the unsecured loan from U.P. Cooperative Sugar Factories Federation Limited, which was remanded for further review. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was partially allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261883</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>