<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (7) TMI 837 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261876</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals for AY 2005-06 and AY 2006-07 for statistical purposes, remanding the cases back to the AO for fresh examination. For AY 2007-08, the Tribunal set aside the addition related to unexplained jewelry, citing the reasonable possession of jewelry based on the assessee&#039;s financial status and customs of gifting. The order was pronounced on 30.06.2015.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Jul 2015 12:08:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=391294" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (7) TMI 837 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261876</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals for AY 2005-06 and AY 2006-07 for statistical purposes, remanding the cases back to the AO for fresh examination. For AY 2007-08, the Tribunal set aside the addition related to unexplained jewelry, citing the reasonable possession of jewelry based on the assessee&#039;s financial status and customs of gifting. The order was pronounced on 30.06.2015.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261876</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>