https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261867 The court dismissed all contentions raised by the petitioners, affirming that the Director General acted within the legal framework by seeking the Competition Commission's approval to expand the investigation. The Commission adhered to due process by forming a prima facie opinion and directing the investigation based on Mr. Kataria's complaint and subsequent information. The Director General did not initiate any investigation suo motu but followed the Commission's directives, thus not overstepping his jurisdiction. Consequently, the writ petitions were dismissed without any order as to costs, and the connected miscellaneous petitions were closed. en-us Wed, 04 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 24 Jul 2015 17:01:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261867 The court dismissed all contentions raised by the petitioners, affirming that the Director General acted within the legal framework by seeking the Competition Commission's approval to expand the investigation. The Commission adhered to due process by forming a prima facie opinion and directing the investigation based on Mr. Kataria's complaint and subsequent information. The Director General did not initiate any investigation suo motu but followed the Commission's directives, thus not overstepping his jurisdiction. Consequently, the writ petitions were dismissed without any order as to costs, and the connected miscellaneous petitions were closed. Case-Laws Law of Competition Wed, 04 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261867