<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1973 (12) TMI 92 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171586</link>
    <description>Election petitions under the Representation of the People Act, 1951 are governed by a strict self-contained limitation scheme. The Court held that a petition is not saved merely because the last day fell on a Saturday when Judges did not sit, if the court office remained open for filing before the Registrar or designated officer; presentation on the next working day was therefore not within time. It further held that section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963 does not apply to election petitions, because the special election law excludes condonation of delay. The effect is that untimely election petitions remain barred by limitation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Dec 1973 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 May 2016 10:44:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=391260" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1973 (12) TMI 92 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171586</link>
      <description>Election petitions under the Representation of the People Act, 1951 are governed by a strict self-contained limitation scheme. The Court held that a petition is not saved merely because the last day fell on a Saturday when Judges did not sit, if the court office remained open for filing before the Registrar or designated officer; presentation on the next working day was therefore not within time. It further held that section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963 does not apply to election petitions, because the special election law excludes condonation of delay. The effect is that untimely election petitions remain barred by limitation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Dec 1973 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171586</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>