https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171581 Exclusion of time under Section 14 of the Limitation Act requires proof that the earlier proceeding was prosecuted in good faith and with due diligence, meaning with due care and attention by a reasonably prudent litigant. Applying that test, the court found that the parties' agreement confined jurisdiction to Delhi courts, so filing the suit at Kheri could not be treated as a bona fide mistake. The plaintiffs therefore failed to satisfy the statutory conditions for Section 14 relief, and the suit remained barred by limitation. en-us Tue, 09 Apr 1963 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 24 Jul 2015 17:03:23 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171581 Exclusion of time under Section 14 of the Limitation Act requires proof that the earlier proceeding was prosecuted in good faith and with due diligence, meaning with due care and attention by a reasonably prudent litigant. Applying that test, the court found that the parties' agreement confined jurisdiction to Delhi courts, so filing the suit at Kheri could not be treated as a bona fide mistake. The plaintiffs therefore failed to satisfy the statutory conditions for Section 14 relief, and the suit remained barred by limitation. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 09 Apr 1963 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171581