https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171579 The Court held that the Sanad issued in favor of the appellant was not considered law under Article 372 of the Constitution, as it was deemed an executive act by the Ruler. The respondent State had the authority to discontinue the cash allowance to the appellant, as the Sanad did not mandate a specific amount of maintenance. The Court found the respondent's actions to be within its executive powers and not illegal or unconstitutional. The appeal was dismissed, affirming the High Court's decision with no order as to costs. en-us Mon, 09 Mar 1964 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 24 Jul 2015 16:42:31 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171579 The Court held that the Sanad issued in favor of the appellant was not considered law under Article 372 of the Constitution, as it was deemed an executive act by the Ruler. The respondent State had the authority to discontinue the cash allowance to the appellant, as the Sanad did not mandate a specific amount of maintenance. The Court found the respondent's actions to be within its executive powers and not illegal or unconstitutional. The appeal was dismissed, affirming the High Court's decision with no order as to costs. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 09 Mar 1964 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171579