https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171578 Time spent in bona fide proceedings under Section 84 of the Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act was excluded when the tenant promptly pursued the correct remedy under Section 29(1), so the later application was treated as within limitation. The Court also accepted that the earlier proceedings were prosecuted with due diligence and good faith, bringing the matter within Section 14 of the Limitation Act. On that basis, the challenge on limitation failed and the order restoring possession to the tenant was sustained. en-us Wed, 28 Oct 1998 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 24 Jul 2015 16:36:49 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171578 Time spent in bona fide proceedings under Section 84 of the Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act was excluded when the tenant promptly pursued the correct remedy under Section 29(1), so the later application was treated as within limitation. The Court also accepted that the earlier proceedings were prosecuted with due diligence and good faith, bringing the matter within Section 14 of the Limitation Act. On that basis, the challenge on limitation failed and the order restoring possession to the tenant was sustained. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 28 Oct 1998 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171578