<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (7) TMI 820 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261859</link>
    <description>Delay in complying with a Tribunal-imposed pre-deposit condition was excused because the amount was ultimately deposited in two instalments while the party was pursuing appellate remedies. The earlier pre-deposit direction remained undisturbed, but the belated compliance was accepted as sufficient to permit the appeals to be heard on merits. The High Court therefore condoned the delay and directed the Tribunal to take up the appeals and proceed in accordance with law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2015 17:57:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=391233" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (7) TMI 820 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261859</link>
      <description>Delay in complying with a Tribunal-imposed pre-deposit condition was excused because the amount was ultimately deposited in two instalments while the party was pursuing appellate remedies. The earlier pre-deposit direction remained undisturbed, but the belated compliance was accepted as sufficient to permit the appeals to be heard on merits. The High Court therefore condoned the delay and directed the Tribunal to take up the appeals and proceed in accordance with law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261859</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>