<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (7) TMI 810 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261849</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the disallowance under Section 40(a)(ia) due to the appellants&#039; failure to deduct tax at the source. The Court rejected arguments for retrospective application of the second proviso and the applicability of the Hindustan Coca Cola principle and Vector Shipping Services judgment. The Tribunal&#039;s order was affirmed as legally valid and sustainable, leading to the dismissal of the appeals.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2015 10:14:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=391221" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (7) TMI 810 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261849</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the disallowance under Section 40(a)(ia) due to the appellants&#039; failure to deduct tax at the source. The Court rejected arguments for retrospective application of the second proviso and the applicability of the Hindustan Coca Cola principle and Vector Shipping Services judgment. The Tribunal&#039;s order was affirmed as legally valid and sustainable, leading to the dismissal of the appeals.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=261849</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>