<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1970 (3) TMI 162 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171565</link>
    <description>An examining authority may cancel an examination at a centre where objective material shows mass use of unfair means and the integrity of the process is undermined. The statutory power to determine and publish results, and to disqualify candidates for adequate reasons, supported the cancellation; in an emergency, the Chairman could act with co-extensive powers and the Board&#039;s later approval treated the action as that of the Board. Individual hearings were not required because the decision was directed at a tainted examination as a whole, not at identified candidates, and insisting on quasi-judicial hearings would be impracticable in such circumstances.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 1970 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 Dec 2017 10:09:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=391188" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1970 (3) TMI 162 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171565</link>
      <description>An examining authority may cancel an examination at a centre where objective material shows mass use of unfair means and the integrity of the process is undermined. The statutory power to determine and publish results, and to disqualify candidates for adequate reasons, supported the cancellation; in an emergency, the Chairman could act with co-extensive powers and the Board&#039;s later approval treated the action as that of the Board. Individual hearings were not required because the decision was directed at a tainted examination as a whole, not at identified candidates, and insisting on quasi-judicial hearings would be impracticable in such circumstances.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 1970 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171565</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>