https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171564 At the investigation stage, an accused has no right to prior notice or hearing before letters rogatory are issued to secure evidence abroad, because such assistance is part of evidence collection and does not by itself determine substantive rights; the orders were therefore not invalid for want of hearing or alleged non-application of mind. The FIR was also held to disclose a prima facie cognizable offence, so the court would not test the truth of the allegations or weigh disputed facts at the threshold. The Joint Parliamentary Committee report, alleged delay in naming public servants, allegations of mala fides, and passport impounding did not bar investigation. The High Court's quashing of the FIR and letters rogatory was set aside and investigation allowed to continue. en-us Thu, 17 Dec 1992 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 24 Jul 2015 12:37:49 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171564 At the investigation stage, an accused has no right to prior notice or hearing before letters rogatory are issued to secure evidence abroad, because such assistance is part of evidence collection and does not by itself determine substantive rights; the orders were therefore not invalid for want of hearing or alleged non-application of mind. The FIR was also held to disclose a prima facie cognizable offence, so the court would not test the truth of the allegations or weigh disputed facts at the threshold. The Joint Parliamentary Committee report, alleged delay in naming public servants, allegations of mala fides, and passport impounding did not bar investigation. The High Court's quashing of the FIR and letters rogatory was set aside and investigation allowed to continue. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 17 Dec 1992 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171564