<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1989 (4) TMI 320 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171559</link>
    <description>A lease must be construed from its express terms as a whole; where the deed stipulated a twenty-year tenure with only contingent extensions, it fell within the exclusion for leases of not less than twelve years under the Calcutta Thika Tenancy Act, 1949, and the occupants were outside thika tenant protection. Prior proceedings, earlier pleadings, participation before the Controller, or dismissal of an earlier special leave petition did not create waiver, estoppel or res judicata absent a final adjudication of thika tenant status. The lease&#039;s intrinsic character could not be altered by conduct or pleadings contrary to its wording.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 03 Apr 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2015 11:50:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=391176" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1989 (4) TMI 320 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171559</link>
      <description>A lease must be construed from its express terms as a whole; where the deed stipulated a twenty-year tenure with only contingent extensions, it fell within the exclusion for leases of not less than twelve years under the Calcutta Thika Tenancy Act, 1949, and the occupants were outside thika tenant protection. Prior proceedings, earlier pleadings, participation before the Controller, or dismissal of an earlier special leave petition did not create waiver, estoppel or res judicata absent a final adjudication of thika tenant status. The lease&#039;s intrinsic character could not be altered by conduct or pleadings contrary to its wording.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Apr 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171559</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>