https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171547 The Supreme Court allowed the appeals, emphasizing the importance of upholding the rights of duly-selected candidates and ensuring that denials of appointment are not based on erroneous decisions or technicalities like the expiration of selection panels. The Court directed the employer to appoint the appellant to the post he was selected for within a specified timeframe, clarifying that the appointment would be prospective. en-us Tue, 11 May 1999 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 23 Jul 2015 17:21:25 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171547 The Supreme Court allowed the appeals, emphasizing the importance of upholding the rights of duly-selected candidates and ensuring that denials of appointment are not based on erroneous decisions or technicalities like the expiration of selection panels. The Court directed the employer to appoint the appellant to the post he was selected for within a specified timeframe, clarifying that the appointment would be prospective. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 11 May 1999 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171547