https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171541 The court held that a decree could only be passed against the executants of the promissory notes, not all defendants. The 1st defendant was held liable for amounts covered by Exts. A1 to A4, and the 1st and 2nd defendants for the amount covered by Ext. A5. The appeal against the plaintiff by the 1st defendant failed, while the 3rd defendant succeeded in the appeal, and the 2nd defendant succeeded in part. Each party was directed to bear their own costs. en-us Wed, 08 Oct 1980 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 23 Jul 2015 16:04:43 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171541 The court held that a decree could only be passed against the executants of the promissory notes, not all defendants. The 1st defendant was held liable for amounts covered by Exts. A1 to A4, and the 1st and 2nd defendants for the amount covered by Ext. A5. The appeal against the plaintiff by the 1st defendant failed, while the 3rd defendant succeeded in the appeal, and the 2nd defendant succeeded in part. Each party was directed to bear their own costs. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 08 Oct 1980 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171541