<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (9) TMI 924 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171536</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, setting aside the duty demand, interest, and penalty imposed on importers for goods auctioned off by the CWC. The Tribunal cited a previous case, noting the unavailability of the goods rendered the demands unsustainable, without addressing the right to relinquish title issue under Section 23 of the Customs Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2015 14:16:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=391139" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (9) TMI 924 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171536</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, setting aside the duty demand, interest, and penalty imposed on importers for goods auctioned off by the CWC. The Tribunal cited a previous case, noting the unavailability of the goods rendered the demands unsustainable, without addressing the right to relinquish title issue under Section 23 of the Customs Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171536</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>