https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171530 Delay was condoned, but the SC declined to interfere on the facts and dismissed the central excise appeals. The order expressly kept the question of law open, so no substantive legal ruling was recorded on the merits of the dispute. en-us Fri, 27 Jul 2007 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 26 Oct 2017 12:22:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171530 Delay was condoned, but the SC declined to interfere on the facts and dismissed the central excise appeals. The order expressly kept the question of law open, so no substantive legal ruling was recorded on the merits of the dispute. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 27 Jul 2007 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171530