<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (6) TMI 694 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171519</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the absolute confiscation of rough diamonds imported under forged licenses but set aside the confiscation of goods due to the absence of filed Bills of Entry. Penalties were upheld or reduced based on the parties involved in the fraud. The Tribunal ordered the refund of sale proceeds with interest for goods improperly confiscated, emphasizing the illegality of seizure without proper documentation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 26 May 2015 18:21:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=391120" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (6) TMI 694 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171519</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the absolute confiscation of rough diamonds imported under forged licenses but set aside the confiscation of goods due to the absence of filed Bills of Entry. Penalties were upheld or reduced based on the parties involved in the fraud. The Tribunal ordered the refund of sale proceeds with interest for goods improperly confiscated, emphasizing the illegality of seizure without proper documentation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171519</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>