<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (5) TMI 807 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171518</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that CHPRCL was liable to pay the duty demand of Rs. 95,12,503/- along with interest. The redemption fine was reduced to Rs. 20 lakhs, and the penalty on CHPRCL was reduced to Rs. 1 lakh. The penalty on the importer JV company was reduced to Rs. 20 lakhs, with the individual constituents jointly liable if the JV failed to pay. Penalties on the officials of CHPRCL and the constituents of the JV were set aside. The appeals were disposed of accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 10 May 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 26 May 2015 18:11:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=391119" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (5) TMI 807 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171518</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that CHPRCL was liable to pay the duty demand of Rs. 95,12,503/- along with interest. The redemption fine was reduced to Rs. 20 lakhs, and the penalty on CHPRCL was reduced to Rs. 1 lakh. The penalty on the importer JV company was reduced to Rs. 20 lakhs, with the individual constituents jointly liable if the JV failed to pay. Penalties on the officials of CHPRCL and the constituents of the JV were set aside. The appeals were disposed of accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 May 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=171518</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>